Skip to content


Why shoes matter for mobile payments

As expected, the battle around mobile wallets is intensifying, with announcements from mobile operators, financial services companies, media giants and more all eager to push the mobile and digital wallet. As I have written before, the biggest hindrance is the “so what” from the consumers. While the industry does back flips over how cool it is to tap your phone to pay, most consumers will likely see this as a very marginal improvement to whipping out your card (which now increasingly can be tapped).

But the incident at Zappos.com – and the promise of more of these to come with other retailers – may be that catalyst to spearhead the uptake much faster than saving time in public transportation queues or getting offers while you shop. 24 million accounts getting hacked is more than a serious number. While card numbers were not compromised, personally identifiable information was. And even though Zappos claims passwords – which a lot of people tend to re-use from one site to another – were encrypted, 24 million data points is pretty good input to any algorithm trying to break encryption codes.

A properly designed wallet, like Visa’s V.me will not only protect your credit card information, but also keep your address, phone number and shipping details secure.  Tom Krazit at moconews makes another compelling argument about how painful it is to have your physical wallet stolen and that it made him rethink the usefulness of a mobile wallet. Krazit’s arguments are indeed spot on, but with ever increasing online commerce and mcommerce, identity theft is likely to be a lot more serious and painful than losing your physical wallet.

Still to be answered is what will compel users’ choice on which wallet to go for. While a physical wallet certainly is choice of style, fashion and capacity, the choice of digital wallet is likely to be far more complex.  Once you get past the basics of storing your credit, debit and loyalty cards, what is it that will convince users to sign up for a specific digital wallet? While certainly the industry is trying to crack the carrot end of the stick by adding offers and all sorts of add-on services to the wallet, the stick of fear is likely to have a far better impact in propelling the digital and mobile wallet.

Disclaimer: The views expressed on this post are mine and do not reflect the views of any clients or companies I am currently working for or have worked for.

Posted in The Business of Mobile.


2011 mobile trends in review

Excellent video created by MobileFuture on mobile’s impact for 2011.  At the same time, I’d like to thank my readers for following this blog, and wish you a prosperous 2012!

 

Posted in The Business of Mobile.

Tagged with .


Mobile payment wars adds to developer headaches

If you are in the business of developing mobile apps, you mainly care about making money. And to make money, you have to charge for it, and in-app billing is arguably among the better ways to charge for an app.

The intense battle between not only payment players but also distribution outlets complicates things enormously for app developers. Apple forces you to use iTunes, Google forces you to use Google Wallet, and lately Samsung announced you have to use their billing and advertising API our you will not be in their app store (from their email sent to app publishers):

“According to the policies of Samsung Apps, application registration using 3 Party billing and Ad system will be restricted from March 1st, 2012. (In App Ad (Android Platform) will be restricted from August 1st, 2012.)”

And there are others trying to control what a developer does. Verizon is effectively blocking Google Wallet from their users, being a telco that has interests in their own wallet initiative, Isis. This is now being challenged by a Stanford professor, who has thankfully gotten the ball rolling on this seemingly illegal attempt by Verizon.

Is this just me, or does this artificial forcing of developer choices seem crazy? Are you now to build in separate payments, ad networks and who knows what else into your app depending on which OS you support, which app store you distribute to, and now which mobile operator your end user is on? I thank professor van Schewick to be among the first to try and end this madness, and hope the pursuit of fairness extends beyond operator control attempts to establishing a free market for application components in general. Let the best wallet and best ad network and best whatever win. Don’t kill the market for developers and users by being greedy and try to own the pie. Let’s keep Dilbert style strategies where they belong…

Dilbert.com

Disclaimer: The views expressed on this post are mine and do not reflect the views of any clients or companies I am currently working for or have worked for.

Posted in The Business of Mobile.

Tagged with , , , .