Ericsson eStore: Sounds vaguely familiar…

This was one that I almost did not catch, but Ericsson announced their eStore initiative in Barcelona a few weeks back. Essentially it is a managed service app store concept they are pushing to mobile operators and media companies.  In that regards, not too different from what Motricity and heaps of others provide.

But honestly, Ericsson has been pushing managed service content portals since 2004, mainly affiliated with Ericsson Mobility World which was/is their center for expertise in mobile content and services. So eStore honestly seems like an old concept in a new wrapping.   The old Mobility World link now leads to “Ericsson Developer Connection“, which is only one component of their offering.

Forgive me for not being excited about this one.  Mobility World has been around for 6 years and has to my knowledge not had any major launches or successes.  Also, if a differentiator for eStore is what Telco 2.0 says, in that they can support multiple business models, then eStore will not make much impact as this must surely be a minimum requirement to even play in the app space.

Maybe I am being too hard on Ericsson here, but putting a new name on a 6 year old initiative is hardly going to make a difference.  Please chime in with your own thoughts through the comments!

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • Ping.fm
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Aussie start-up takes on Foursquare,Gowalla (..and Google?)

Aussie start-up Dream Walk Mobile just launched their Dream Walk App. Essentially this is a “treasure hunt” style app, where users fire it up, and can see offers from local retail stores in their vicinity.  The principle is fairly simple: As an advertiser, you offer instant prizes, stamps that need collecting, or clues, which the user has to solve that leads to the ultimate prize.

To make it all work, they have a few, but very important rules that advertisers must obey:

The rules are probably what will make this work for Dream Walk.  Gowalla and Foursquare offer a lot more in terms of network value and integration with social networks.  Dream Walk Mobile is simple: Use it and you will get free stuff.  Dream Walk also has the advantage that the value of using their app is not tied to the number for people or friends using it.

You can of course argue how long it would take Google to offer the same if they decided to. A week?  But Google does not at least currently have this model, and allows advertising on maps based on bidding.  It could very well be that Dream Walk Mobile’s model is what will have them be somewhat unique, at least for a while.

Of course, they still need to solve the issue of getting enough users, and that those users actually fire up the app while walking around the cities. In this regards, they have had a heavy focus towards advertisers, and using the service is quite simple.  I would certainly jump at the chance for a free coffe – but doubt I see the day when I see a free car get offered. Then again, if they get an advertiser to jump on that, solving how to get users and having them have the app running would not be a problem.  The concept is tried and tested, and scavenger hunts like Norway’s Radio 1 “The Hunted” has been proven to successfully drive listeners, users and traffic.  Stay tuned.

What do you think? Will this type of model prevail? Or will it be marginalized? Please add your comments.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • Ping.fm
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Mobile VOIP: Is voice as the killer app making a comeback?

Two of the sharpest minds in the wireless industry, Ajit Jaokar of Oxford University and Chetan Sharma of the consulting firm that bears his name, have written an excellent report on mobile VOIP and argues convincingly that mobile VOIP is near the tipping point, i.e. the point of adoption which makes it take off in rocket speed.  Recent acquisitions by Telefonica of mobile VOIP company JahJah for $206m may indicate that they are not alone in thinking this, and they make a strong case against GigaOm’s earlier gloomy predictions.

Since their report was sponsored by Skype, it therefore deserves some scrutiny. The report makes a very good case on several levels.  Some of the argument presented agains mobile VOIP is that it will cannibalize operator voice revenue, thus is facing an uphill battle.  Well, there has been resistance for sure, but the premises are changing:

Another argument against mobile VOIP is that the networks are not good enough to support it. This is simply not true. Sharma/Jaokar shows that mobile VOIP actually uses less data than browsing:

This is where Sharma/Jaokar neglect one issue though: networks are already congested.  Uptake is driven by video watching (which is the hightest bandwidth hog) and general growth in smartphone uptake and data plans.  This could be a major hindrance for mobile VOIP, as this usage steals bandwidth and callers may experience delay, poor quality or dropped calls. While you may accept this because you are saving money while talking to grandma, it will certainly rule it out for business calls, unless you happen to be in a city with a vast density of cell towers and you are prepared to not move around too much when you have your call (which does make it slightly less “mobile”).

However, investments into higher speed (4G, LTE, Wimax) networks are being made, and technology that allows seemless switch between wifi, mobile, wimax etc, but this will take some time before it is universal.

Then there is the question of whether voice is a killer app?  Or will it fade away as the research in Ireland mentioned in the report which showed that teenagers resort to voice as a last resort, after Facebook messages, tweets, sms or IM is exhausted (notice that email has been purposely left out here). Personally I am going the other way as I found that electronic communications simply fails to capture the context which is so important in a business setting. Then again, it has been a while since I’ve been a teenager…

Voice may definitely be making a come back as a communications channel, but also as an interaction tool. Services like GetFugu (see left) and I suspect very soon Google Voice Search uses voice as the trigger for search and for brand interaction.  Do not be surprised to see voice search integrated into Google Voice as well  (no, I do not have insight into Google’s development plans, but this would be what they say an educated guess about what Google Voice is really about…).

The real opportunity here definitely lies within the aspect of multichannel communication. Google Wave can perhaps be construed as a half hearted attempt (yes, I am not a convert — yet), but since they acquired Gizmo5 and launched Google Voice you know they are serious about it.  Other players, like Orbit are trying to create app centric multi communication/feed experiences. The service is still crude, but getting there.

If I can merge my phone book with my facebook list and LinkedIn contacts (honestly do not need Twitter followers, I’ll leave that for online marketers and social media “experts”), with VOIP, SMS and their respective messaging facilities – all in a user friendly interface, which can run in the background on my phone and my PC – then we have something. Interested VCs, please just get in touch :) .

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • Ping.fm
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz